INVARCHIVES
HomeInvestigationsArchiveNewsletter
LoginSubscribe
InvArchives/Entities/Sigrid S. McCawley
Entity

Sigrid S. McCawley

26 documentsActive: 2018–202020 connections

Sigrid S. McCawley (entity) is referenced across 26 documents in the publicly released Epstein DOJ archive. This profile links every cited document, the entities that co-occur with Sigrid S. McCawley, and any associated photographs or financial records.

Cited Documents
vol00008-2-efta00023272.pdf
Order
2020
vol00008-official-doj-latest-efta00022960.pdf
Order
2020
EFTA00023926.pdf
Order
2020
vol00008-official-doj-latest-efta00023230.pdf
Order
2019
vol00008-2-efta00023542.pdf
Order
2019
EFTA00024263.pdf
Order
2019
vol00008-official-doj-latest-efta00029535.pdf
Order
2021
EFTA00010465.pdf
Order
2021
vol00008-2-efta00029852.pdf
Order
2021
EFTA00030617.pdf
Order
2021
vol00008-2-efta00010410.pdf
Order
2021
vol00008-official-doj-latest-efta00010410.pdf
Order
2021
vol00010-efta01297296-pdf
Giuffre v. Maxwell
LEGAL · 2017
vol00010-efta01387852-pdf
V. Maxwell 1:15cv7433
LEGAL · 2015
vol00008-2-efta00028423.pdf
Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Response to Motion
2021
EFTA00029184.pdf
Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Response to Motion
2021
vol00008-official-doj-latest-efta00028106.pdf
Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Response to Motion
2021
EFTA00018899.pdf
Order
2020
vol00008-2-efta00018289.pdf
Order
2020
vol00008-official-doj-latest-efta00018289.pdf
Order
2020
Co-occurring Entities
New York21Ghislaine Maxwell19Southern District of New York18David Boies15Maxwell15Laura A. Menninger13Ty Gee12NYC9P.C.9District Court9Main Document Original9Laura Menninger9Denver9USA v. Maxwell Case Number9Jeffrey S. Pagliuca7Fed6Fort Lauderdale6NEW YORK6Esq6NY6

This profile aggregates references to Sigrid S. McCawley across publicly released documents from the Epstein case archive. All individuals mentioned are presumed innocent unless convicted in a court of law. Appearance in a document does not imply wrongdoing. Readers are encouraged to review the cited source documents directly.