Julius Baer — Documents & Connections | Epstein Archive

Julius Baer (entity) is referenced across 142 documents in the publicly released Epstein DOJ archive. This profile links every cited document, the entities that co-occur with Julius Baer, and any associated photographs or financial records.

Cited Documents

vol00010-efta02203185-pdf

Subject: Alert - reminder: Cedric and Boris from Julius Baer want to know your travel plans to Europe

EMAIL · 2017

vol00010-efta01967241-pdf

To: ehud barak[ mail.com]

EMAIL · 2013

vol00010-efta01967369-pdf

To: _—ehud barak

EMAIL · 2013

vol00010-efta01967587-pdf

to: —-cLon, Civic

EMAIL · 449

vol00010-efta02203039-pdf

Order

EMAIL · 2017

vol00010-efta02202843-pdf

To: Jefffrey Epstein[jeevacation@gmail.com]

EMAIL · 2017

vol00010-efta02202915-pdf

Order

EMAIL · 2017

vol00008-2-efta00010819.pdf

vol00008-official-doj-latest-efta00010819.pdf

--- PAGE BREAK ---

2021

vol00009-efta00069421-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00069421-pdf

vol00009-efta00067752-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00067752-pdf

vol00009-efta00067130-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00067130-pdf

vol00009-efta00069571-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00069571-pdf

vol00009-efta00070998-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00070998-pdf

vol00009-efta00070362-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00070362-pdf

vol00009-efta00070202-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00070202-pdf

vol00009-efta00070043-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00070043-pdf

vol00009-efta00069716-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00069716-pdf

vol00009-efta00065103-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00065103-pdf

Co-occurring Entities

DEA90 Europe Standard50 Boris Subject50 ICE50 Original Message34 Apple33 Microsoft32 On May30 Department of Justice30 FBI30 DOJ30 Deutsche Bank29 No Subject29 Credit Suisse29 Hong Kong28 Supreme Court27 Barry C. Honig27 Anton Chia27

This profile aggregates references to Julius Baer across publicly released documents from the Epstein case archive. All individuals mentioned are presumed innocent unless convicted in a court of law. Appearance in a document does not imply wrongdoing. Readers are encouraged to review the cited source documents directly.