James Clement — Documents & Connections | Epstein Archive

James Clement (entity) is referenced across 33 documents in the publicly released Epstein DOJ archive. This profile links every cited document, the entities that co-occur with James Clement, and any associated photographs or financial records.

Cited Documents

vol00011-efta02717340-pdf

From: Lesley Groff < >

2014

vol00010-efta01980600-pdf

To: jeffrey E.[jeevacation@gmail.com]

2014

vol00010-efta01980272-pdf

From: jeffrey E.

EMAIL · 2014

vol00010-efta01979712-pdf

To: George Church

EMAIL · 2014

vol00010-efta01919154-pdf

To: george chu

EMAIL · 2014

vol00010-efta01916477-pdf

To: jeffrey E.[jeevacation@gmail.com]

EMAIL · 2014

vol00010-efta01917108-pdf

To: george church

2014

vol00010-efta01917808-pdf

To: jeffrey E.[jeevacation@gmail.com]

EMAIL · 2014

vol00010-efta01918194-pdf

To: George Church iy

EMAIL · 2014

vol00010-efta01920172-pdf

To: jeffrey E.[jeevacation@gmail.com]

EMAIL · 2014

vol00010-efta02094215-pdf

To: Jeffrey Epstein[jeevacation@gmail.com]

EMAIL · 2014

vol00010-efta02094120-pdf

To: James Clement{ {IM |: Luhan

EMAIL · 2014

vol00010-efta02093502-pdf

From: Lesley Groff

EMAIL · 2014

vol00009-efta00996004-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00996004-pdf

vol00009-efta00997325-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00997325-pdf

vol00009-efta00998421-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00998421-pdf

vol00009-efta00998716-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00998716-pdf

vol00009-efta00998824-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00998824-pdf

vol00009-efta00998841-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00998841-pdf

vol00009-efta00999514-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00999514-pdf

Co-occurring Entities

Luhan Yang24 Vatsan Raman12 Justin Quinn12 Kevin Esvelt12 Dan Mandell12 Bobby Dhadwar12 Rich Terry12 Prashant Mali12 ICE12 DEA11 George Church11 Meghan Radden10 Genome9 Amyris9 Jeffrey8 George From8 CGI7 Eric7

This profile aggregates references to James Clement across publicly released documents from the Epstein case archive. All individuals mentioned are presumed innocent unless convicted in a court of law. Appearance in a document does not imply wrongdoing. Readers are encouraged to review the cited source documents directly.