David Rogers — Documents & Connections | Epstein Archive

David Rogers (entity) is referenced across 65 documents in the publicly released Epstein DOJ archive. This profile links every cited document, the entities that co-occur with David Rogers, and any associated photographs or financial records.

Cited Documents

vol00010-efta01319209-pdf

FedEx Invoice for Jeffrey E. Epstein

FINANCIAL · 2001

vol00010-efta01315057-pdf

FedEx Invoice for Jeffrey E. Epstein

FINANCIAL · 2001

vol00010-efta01318747-pdf

FedEx Invoice Summary

FINANCIAL · 2000

vol00008-2-efta00021752.pdf

Subpoena

vol00009-efta00081116-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00081116-pdf

vol00008-official-doj-latest-efta00021440.pdf

Subpoena

vol00009-efta00068582-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00068582-pdf

vol00009-efta00068228-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00068228-pdf

vol00009-efta00205254-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00205254-pdf

vol00009-efta00080827-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00080827-pdf

vol00009-efta00191396-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00191396-pdf

vol00009-efta00159173-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00159173-pdf

vol00009-efta00159483-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00159483-pdf

vol00009-efta00162520-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00162520-pdf

vol00009-efta00188608-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00188608-pdf

vol00009-efta00068215-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00068215-pdf

vol00009-efta00204879-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00204879-pdf

vol00009-efta00205116-pdf

DOJ Document vol00009-efta00205116-pdf

EFTA00022406.pdf

Subpoena

vol00010-efta01682078-pdf

DOJ Document vol00010-efta01682078-pdf

CORRESPONDENCE

Co-occurring Entities

ICE57 Jeffrey Epstein53 DEA48 Palm Beach48 FBI46 West Palm46 Jeffrey Epstein44 Jane Doe41 U.S. Attorney40 Police Department39 Ghislaine Maxwell37 Crime Victims36 Alan Dershowitz36 Palm Beach35 Rights Act35 Fort Lauderdale34 Justice Department32 United States District Court

This profile aggregates references to David Rogers across publicly released documents from the Epstein case archive. All individuals mentioned are presumed innocent unless convicted in a court of law. Appearance in a document does not imply wrongdoing. Readers are encouraged to review the cited source documents directly.