Stewart Oldfield** served as the listed personal banker at Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas for at least five entities connected to Jeffrey Epstein — a role that placed him at the center of a banking relationship Deutsche Bank later paid **$150 million** to settle.
Get the full documents delivered to your inbox — subscribe to the InvArchives newsletter.
Deutsche Bank account statements filed under seal and now unsealed in the Epstein archive identify Oldfield by name on accounts for JEGE, Inc., Epstein's shell company registered at 6100 Red Hook Quarter, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Document vol00010-efta01287105-pdf, dated October 2017, lists "Stewart Oldfield" as the designated "personal assistance" contact — with a direct phone number — for the JEGE account.
A separate statement shows Oldfield serving the same role for Gratitude America, Ltd., another USVI-registered entity linked to Epstein. Document vol00010-efta01287186-pdf records a month in which $250,012 flowed into that account, with outgoing wire transfers to an Italian bank, an independent film organization, and a New York-based nonprofit.
A third set of statements documents Oldfield as banker for HBRK Associates Inc., the firm run by Epstein's financial advisor Richard Kahn. Document vol00010-efta01287371-pdf shows HBRK's Deutsche Bank checking account held over $444,000 in February 2018, with Oldfield named as the relationship manager.
The archive does not only contain account statements. An email chain from January 2017 — Document vol00010-efta02203975-pdf — shows Oldfield coordinating access between Epstein and Deutsche Bank clients. The exchange arranges a meeting between Epstein and Todd Stevens, a Deutsche Bank professional, at Epstein's Manhattan townhouse at 9 East 71st Street.
Epstein's assistant wrote to Oldfield: "Jeffrey will be in NY on Monday Jan. 30th...might you and Todd have time to come see him this day at his home?" Oldfield confirmed the appointment with a reply: "Great! Thanks."
Richard Kahn of HBRK Associates was copied on the scheduling emails, cementing the three-way relationship between Oldfield, Kahn, and Epstein's office that appears repeatedly across the archive.
Document vol00010-efta02202922-pdf shows Oldfield coordinating a second visit to Epstein's home the same week, again routed through Kahn's office. The emails carry a Classification: Confidential header from Deutsche Bank's internal communication system.
The flow of Deutsche Bank products into Epstein's circle is also documented. In February 2018, Oldfield forwarded a rate sheet for Deutsche Bank preferred certificates of deposit to Kahn — who immediately forwarded it to Epstein.
Document vol00009-efta00895204-pdf records Epstein replying the same day with an Airbnb link, confirming receipt. The subject line: "DB preferred deposits and CDs - rate update as of 2/5/18."
Oldfield's note offered rates of up to 2% on short-term CDs, including a promotional campaign running through February 28, 2018. The correspondence shows Deutsche Bank's wealth management division actively soliciting Epstein's business even as his 2008 conviction remained part of his public record.
In July 2020, the New York Department of Financial Services fined Deutsche Bank $150 million for "serious compliance failures" in its relationship with Epstein. Regulators found the bank had processed millions of dollars in transactions for Epstein's accounts after his 2008 conviction — including payments regulators said bore hallmarks of sex trafficking.
The DFS order did not name Oldfield individually. The 1,719 documents in the archive that reference Oldfield provide granular detail on how that relationship was managed at the account level, month by month, across multiple Epstein entities.
The account statements and emails together establish Oldfield as the operational point of contact for the entire Epstein relationship at Deutsche Bank — not a compliance officer or executive, but the banker whose name and phone number appeared on each statement sent to Epstein's shell companies.
Deutsche Bank's $150 million settlement resolved the regulatory claims. The documents now in the public archive record how the day-to-day relationship functioned — and whose name was on each account.
All individuals mentioned are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law.
Share this investigation