Darren K. Indyke** was named co-executor of **Jeffrey Epstein's $577 million estate** two days before the financier's death — and the same attorney had spent years emailing federal sex offender registry officials about Epstein's travel plans from a personal AOL account.
11,386 documents from the EFTA archive place Indyke at the center of Epstein's legal operation: a New York attorney who managed everything from private jet itineraries to the Virgin Islands probate court that would distribute a half-billion-dollar fortune.
Get the full documents delivered to your inbox — subscribe to the InvArchives newsletter.
The Will Signed Two Days Before Death
Epstein's Last Will and Testament was dated August 8, 2019. He died on August 10, 2019, in New York. Two days separated the signing of the document and the official end of his life.
The probate petition, filed with the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands and stamped EFTA00027979, names Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as co-executors. Together, they were appointed to administer an estate the filing valued at $577,672,654.
The assets inventoried in the petition span continents. $56.5 million in cash, $112.7 million in equities, and $194.9 million in hedge funds and private equity formed the bulk of liquid holdings.
Virgin Islands properties were listed separately: Little St. James Island, held through Nautilus, Inc., at $63.9 million; Great St. James Island, through Poplar, Inc., at $22.5 million.
Paris apartments were buried inside a chain of shell corporations. Maple, Inc. owned Cypress, Inc., which owned Laurel, Inc., which held 999 shares of SCI JEP — a French company controlling multiple units in an unnamed Paris building.
The will included a notable provision: "No bond or other security shall be required of any Executor in any jurisdiction." Indyke and Kahn would control the estate without any financial guarantee to the court.
Filing Sex Offender Travel Notices by AOL
Document EFTA01263156 is a chain of emails forwarded by Shani Pinney, Territorial Sex Offender Registry Program Manager at the Virgin Islands Department of Justice, to U.S. Marshals Service.
The emails were sent by Darren Indyke using his personal AOL account, dkiesq@aol.com. Each one reported a modification to Epstein's travel plans, as required under his sex offender registration obligations.
On September 29, 2018, Indyke wrote:
"Mr. Epstein will travel by private aircraft, N212JE, on September 30, 2018 from his vacation home in New York, New York to his vacation home in Paris, France. He expects to arrive at Le Bourget Airport in Paris, France at approximately 7:30PM local time."
The next day, September 30, Indyke sent a modification. The Paris trip was off:
"Mr. Epstein's trip to Paris has been canceled. He will travel today from his vacation home in New York, New York to his vacation home in Palm Beach, Florida where he expects to stay until October 13, 2018. On October 13, 2018, Mr. Epstein plans to return from his vacation home in Palm Beach, Florida to his permanent residence in the U.S. Virgin Islands."
A second batch of these notifications appears in EFTA01305746, confirming the same itinerary updates were forwarded to federal authorities.
These notices were not automated filings. Indyke personally authored each one, signing them "Darren K. Indyke" and offering his New York office number for follow-up questions.
Deutsche Bank's Four-Year Due Diligence File
Between October 2016 and August 2018, Deutsche Bank's compliance division ran background checks on Darren Indyke at least four times. The documents — produced as part of the bank's Know Your Customer (KYC) process — are stamped with SDNY grand jury designations and Epstein archive numbers.
The October 2016 review (EFTA01255112) was prepared by research analyst Prachi Pawa on October 12, 2016. The June 2017 review (EFTA01297143, EFTA01296686) was prepared by Shanu Gujaria. A May 2018 review (EFTA01297717) followed. August 2018 brought two more reports (EFTA01297830 and EFTA01298113), prepared by analyst Mamta Choudhary.
All four rounds returned no negative media, no OFAC matches, and no court cases. Deutsche Bank cleared Indyke repeatedly as part of its compliance review of the Epstein client relationship.
The reports list Indyke's address as 7061 Dubonnet Drive, Boca Raton, Florida 33433 in Palm Beach County — the same county where Epstein maintained a vacation home and where his 2008 conviction was prosecuted.
The Probate Filing
Eight days after Epstein's death, Indyke and Kahn formally petitioned the Virgin Islands Superior Court to open probate. The filing requested that the August 8 will be admitted, that both men be appointed executors, and that no bond be required — per the will's explicit language.
The estate's sole heir was identified as Mark Epstein, Jeffrey's brother, described as an adult with a 100% share.
The petition was filed through Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC, a Virgin Islands law firm. The filing acknowledged that Indyke and Kahn were not residents of the territory but argued they qualified under Virgin Islands law because the local firm had agreed to accept service of all court papers.
The $577 million figure carried a caveat: values were subject to appraisal and date-of-death confirmation. Final inventory figures were to follow.
Conclusion
The 11,386 documents that reference or involve Darren Indyke reveal a lawyer whose role in Epstein's life went far beyond standard legal counsel. He tracked Epstein's movements for federal authorities, survived repeated Deutsche Bank compliance reviews, and was positioned to administer nearly $600 million within hours of his client's death.
His name appears across volumes of the EFTA archive — in probate filings, compliance reports, and travel notices sent from a personal AOL account to the U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Justice.
All individuals mentioned are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law.
Share this investigation
This analysis references publicly released documents from the Epstein case archive. All individuals mentioned are presumed innocent unless convicted in a court of law. Language such as “documents indicate” reflects what appears in source materials, not conclusions of guilt. Readers are encouraged to review the cited source documents directly.