Legal disclaimer: This article is based solely on documents released in the federal EFTA (Electronic Filing and Text Archive) production, made public through litigation. All facts are drawn from those documents. This article does not assert guilt, wrongdoing, or criminal conduct on the part of any individual. Language such as "documents indicate," "records show," and "alleged" reflects the evidentiary basis and does not constitute a legal conclusion. Minors are not identified in this reporting.
Al Seckel, a science popularizer and collector of optical illusions who partnered with Isabel Maxwell — sister of Ghislaine Maxwell — corresponded with Jeffrey Epstein across roughly 700 documents in the federal archive between 2010 and 2013. The correspondence, records show, describes a paid campaign to reshape Epstein's search-engine and Wikipedia presence, requests for multi-million-dollar loans, and a case in which Epstein's own attorneys moved to block Seckel from being deposed by an attorney representing Epstein's accusers.
Get the full documents delivered to your inbox — subscribe to the InvArchives newsletter.
On September 13, 2010, Al Seckel emailed Epstein at his "jeevacation@gmail.com" address describing an online campaign already underway:
"I talked with Pablos. We are good to go! Once started, one should start seeing results with a week to ten days, and then it will start completely disappearing, once the caches get dumped... We will bring other things to the top, such as good stories, which means we will have to create a web site, or other things, to put up, and push people to, if they search under any possible keywords or related names, such as Ghislaine. It is basically the opposite of what most people do, which is to get top ratings by the search engines. So, they just do the inverse, hack some of the sites, and redirect others."
(Al Seckel to Jeffrey Epstein, "Update," September 13, 2010).
Two days later, Seckel proposed a specific tactic: redirecting attention toward a different, real person who happened to share Epstein's name.
"It turns out that there is another Jeffrey Epstein, who is a high end executive for Oracle. Little does he know that he is about to receive an enormous push of secret publicity, moving him to the search results, while you quietly disappear...."
Epstein's reply noted a second unrelated namesake and discussed which search term combinations mattered (Al Seckel–Jeffrey Epstein exchange, "Update," September 15, 2010).
A three-page email dated November 28, 2010, addressed to a person named Jessica and copied to Epstein, lays out the operation in detail. Seckel wrote that the effort had "two main goals": building a "positive humanitarian" web presence for Epstein and "replac[ing] the negative articles with... positive articles."
The email describes three websites built for the campaign — a science-interview site, a philanthropy site, and, in Seckel's words, "a third site for a pseudo Jeffrey Epstein, which will bury all the negative videos on Jeffrey that float all over the web." It also describes promoting unrelated people who share Epstein's name, including "a medical doctor who does hair transplants and reconstruction surgery" and the Oracle executive, "so that they too can be strong in google rankings," and references "whole teams working in the Philippines" building backlinks (Al Seckel to "Jessica," cc Jeffrey Epstein, "Help needed on Jeff's sites - Confidential," November 28, 2010).
On the subject of Wikipedia, the same email states:
"In terms of Wikipedia, which we knew that we would never be able to remove its first place ranking, we did manage to tone it down considerably, remove his mug shot and description of him as being 'arrested by the Palm Beach Police Department' with his good photo with the caption: American financier and philanthropist... There were external links, there was nothing positive, etc. We toned this down immensely, removed the Daily Beast links, inserted large sections on his philanthropy... This was a very big job as they had 27 people watching this site, and at first every time we made a single edit, they would go back and switch it back within less than 15 minutes, usually to something worse. We had to actually hack their IP addresses to block them from interfering with Wiki, and now the site has been stable in our direction for weeks."
A follow-up "Results" email sent by Seckel to Epstein on December 15, 2010 reports the outcome in similar terms: the Huffington Post article on Epstein had been "push[ed]... down the page," a Daily Beast article had been removed from prominent placement, and "toxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you typed in your name" had been eliminated. The email states that "Wikipedia was an important victory," that headlines no longer read "convicted sex offender or pedophile," and that "we hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption." The same email requests payment: "You paid Mike $2500... but his fee of $7500 balance is now due if you want to continue" (Al Seckel to Jeffrey Epstein, "Results," December 15, 2010).
Documents do not indicate whether the invoiced work was completed by an outside contractor referred to only as "Mike," nor do they identify who among the described "teams" performed specific tasks.
The correspondence also documents a financial dimension to the relationship. On October 17, 2010 — the same day Seckel and Isabel Maxwell sent a joint invitation to a party at their Malibu home — Seckel asked Epstein to wire $10,000 directly to Maxwell's account "for all these teams," writing, "I am not keeping a single penny... This is definite value for your money" (Al Seckel to Jeffrey Epstein, "Important," October 17, 2010; invitation from "Al Seckel and Isabel Maxwell," October 17, 2010).
On December 7, 2010, Seckel raised a larger request. "For a 3.5 mil loan for one year... How much actual and real secured collateral would you need," he wrote, calling it "actually a real question." Epstein countered with "6 million," and Seckel responded by asking, "Can we make it 8 million in secured credit? Just easier. What would be your loan rate?" (Al Seckel–Jeffrey Epstein loan exchange, "Re: Question," December 7, 2010). The documents do not indicate whether a loan was ultimately made.
Seckel and Epstein also co-organized the "Mindshift Conference," held in early January 2011 on the island of St. Thomas and at Epstein's private Caribbean property, Little Saint James. A November 5, 2010 announcement describes an "intimate group of exceptional thinkers and achievers" convened to discuss artificial intelligence, complexity theory, theoretical physics, evolutionary biology, and cognitive neuroscience, with images of several scientists attached to the planning email (Al Seckel to Jeffrey Epstein, "Jeffrey Epstein to host Mindshift Conference," November 5, 2010).
Planning correspondence from mid-December 2010 shows Epstein directing that spouses be kept apart from the substantive sessions — "I want as litttle contact with spouses as i can, zero would be fine" — while Seckel pushed back, suggesting shared meals and hikes (Al Seckel–Jeffrey Epstein, "Re: MINDSHIFT," December 17, 2010). A detailed logistics memo sent to attendees on December 22, 2010 covers travel arrangements to St. Thomas and instructions for the island portion of the trip (Al Seckel, "Please Keep and Read," December 22, 2010).
In 2011, while the reputation campaign and conference planning were ongoing, Epstein was the plaintiff in a defamation suit, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards, filed in Palm Beach County Circuit Court (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). Bradley Edwards was, at the time, an attorney representing individuals who had accused Epstein of abuse.
Court filings in the archive show that in April 2011, Edwards's office noticed a deposition of Al Seckel, to take place in Los Angeles. Epstein's attorneys responded with a motion asking the court to quash the subpoena, arguing that Seckel "has no [personal knowledge]" relevant to the case (Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoena... to Prevent Deposition of Alfred Seckel, filed 2011). A schedule of pending motions filed with the court on April 26, 2011 lists the motion to quash Seckel's deposition alongside Epstein's other discovery motions in the case (Statement of Pending Motions, Epstein v. Rothstein, April 26, 2011; deposition schedule). The documents in the archive do not show how the court ultimately ruled on the motion.
The archive also contains material from an earlier, unrelated lawsuit — Al Seckel v. Tom McIver, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (Case No. CV07-3134 GAF) — arising from public statements McIver had made questioning Seckel's academic background (Defendant Tom McIver's Answer to First Amended Complaint; declaration of Bart D. Hibbs).
That dispute surfaced again in Seckel's correspondence with Epstein. On November 27, 2010, Epstein wrote to Seckel: "please take your name off my web page.. ITs caused us more problems than it is worth... Others are now up my ass, regarding, did you get a degree from Cornell. were you ever regeisted as a student at Caltech, I don't give a shit." Seckel replied that his "Caltech ID number" was genuine, that "Mclver and his cohorts literally deluged Caltech with inflamatory letters," and forwarded what he described as a sworn declaration and McIver's own statement admitting he had "falsely accused me of various things" (Jeffrey Epstein–Al Seckel exchange, November 27, 2010; Al Seckel, "Re: Fw: Pearce declaration," November 26, 2010). A separate email from Epstein to Seckel on November 1, 2010 reads: "re wiki,, all lawsuits settled... you can site news articles" (Jeffrey Epstein to Al Seckel, November 1, 2010).
Taken together, the documents describe a multi-year relationship in which Al Seckel functioned as both a social collaborator — co-hosting a private conference on Epstein's island — and, according to his own emails, the organizer of an online campaign to alter search-engine results and Wikipedia content about Epstein, while separately requesting substantial loans from him. In 2011, Epstein's attorneys sought to prevent Seckel from testifying in litigation brought by Epstein against an attorney for his accusers. Al Seckel, who died in 2015, was not charged with any crime in connection with these matters. Isabel Maxwell has not been charged with any crime in connection with Jeffrey Epstein and does not appear in the correspondence beyond the two references described above.
This article is based on documents in the EFTA federal archive. InvArchives does not assert criminal wrongdoing by any person named. All quoted material is reproduced from the underlying documents, including original spelling and typographical errors.
Cited Documents
Share this investigation